Skip to content

MassRetirees.com

Increase font size  Decrease font size  Default font size 
You are here:   Home arrow Legislation arrow COLA Base Proposal By Year's End
COLA Base Proposal By Year's End PDF Print E-mail
SEPTEMBER 2005 - Legislative Package Moving Forward - After years of lobbying and months of intense study, a proposal is nearly finished to raise the $12,000 COLA base to a higher level.

The Association is eagerly awaiting the results of the actuarial study and recommendations by the Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission (PERAC), relative to raising the COLA base above its current $12,000 level. Association officers have been working closely with PERAC to assist in the report, which is due to be filed by the end of the year.

Once the COLA study is complete, the Association plans to file a bill to raise the COLA base to a higher level. A similar bill has recently been filed by the Essex Regional Retirement System, which is seeking legislative approval to move to a higher base at the local level.

"The PERAC study and report is a significant first step at raising the base. Given the amounts of money involved and the complexity of the issue, we could not proceed without this study," said Association President Ralph White. "At this point, we know that increasing the base is expensive, but with some creativity with the pension funding schedule it can be done. Retirees have waited patiently for eight years, and now is the time to move forward."

Bills' Progress

Nearly eight months into the 2005-2006 Legislative Session, three Association backed bills have been reported favorably by the Joint Committee on Public Service and are now making their way through the legislative process.

Of great interest to veterans, retired on disability, is SB2035. Filed by Senator Steven Panagiotakos (D-Lowell), the bill was originally SB1584, but was assigned a new number upon its favorable release by the Public Service Committee. The bill is now awaiting action before the Senate Committee on Ways and Means.

As of press time, Association lobbyists had received assurances, from Ways and Means Chairman Therese Murray, that the Senate intends on bringing the bill up for a vote in the near future. Panagiotakos, who is the Committee's vice chairman, has been spearheading efforts to obtain quick passage.

SB2035 grants a bonus ($15 for each year of creditable service, up to a maximum of $300 annually) to those veterans, who retired as a result of a work-related accidental disability. At this point, the bill remains retroactive to the date of one's retirement.

At the same time, two separate bills are progressing forward that would increase various survivor's benefits. HB291, which was filed by Representative Brad Jones (R-North Reading) on behalf of the Association, increases the minimum pension of survivors of active employees, who died as a result of a non-work related cause.

If passed, the minimum pension for survivors under Option D would increase from $3,000 to $6,000 annually. The bill was reported favorably to the House Committee on Ways and Means, where it is under review.

A second bill, that will increase the pension allowance paid to the surviving dependents of disability retirees, was filed by the Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission (PERAC), is supported by the Association. HB13 was released favorably by both the Public Service and House Ways and Means Committees. The bill is now awaiting further action before the House Committee on Steering and Policy.

Option C Under Review

While a handful of bills have been discharged favorably from Public Service, the majority of the Association's bills remain under review or await public hearings.

Of great interest to a number of members is SB1565, the Option C recalculation legislation. As an indication of the great interest in this subject, as many as ten separate bills have been filed that would recalculate the Option C retirement based on an updated mortality table.

Last year, controversy arose when the Legislature instructed PERAC to implement a new updated mortality table for active employees, which is used to calculate Option C retirements. The table, that had previously been in use for more than 60 years, was based on 1928 life expectancies.

 
< Prev   Next >