Skip to content

MassRetirees.com

Increase font size  Decrease font size  Default font size 
You are here:   Home arrow Legislation arrow Ballot Question Endangers Municipal Insurance
Ballot Question Endangers Municipal Insurance PDF Print E-mail
SEPTEMBER 2000 - Tax Cut Could Force Local Cuts - Members, insured under one of the many health insurance plans offered through the state's municipalities, should pay very close attention to the pending ballot initiative that seeks to roll back the state income tax rate to 5%.

As we mentioned in the July edition of the Voice, Governor Paul Cellucci has joined forces with Citizens For Limited Taxation and Government, to place a provision on the November ballot cutting state income taxes up to $1.5 billion dollars. Proponents of the tax cut argue that the state's red hot economy will grow even hotter as a result of the cut.

While the cut may be good news for the business community, municipal officials warn that it could prove to be disastrous at the local level. The past decade has seen a remarkable jump in state aide to the cities and towns. Not only have the funds prompted an influx of investment in public education, but have also worked to stabilize local property taxes.

"There is no question that many of our cities and towns depend heavily on the aid that they receive from the Commonwealth. The state aid is vital, not only to education and infrastructure, but to the entire municipal budget," explains David Baier, legislative director of the Mass. Municipal Association. "Even with the current level of aid, many municipal budgets are stretched very thin. If you take $1.2-$1.5 billion dollars off the table, then state programs will have to be cut.

"Our fear is that any reduction in local aid will prove to be disastrous on municipal budgets. This will result in both a reduction of municipal services and sharp property tax increases."

It may seem strange that the Association is on the same page as the Mass. Municipal Association on this issue. Members will recall that we clashed with the MMA on Chapter 17 (1997 COLA law) and on other occasions. But each issue has to be judged separately on its own merit. It's not uncommon for foes on one issue to bond on another issue.

State/Local Cuts Likely

Since the Education Reform Act of 1993 took effect, the state has been spending several billion dollars each year in local aid to public schools. This is in addition to the billion dollars in general aid that annually flows from the state to the cities and towns. In the current fiscal year, more than $4 billion dollars will be given to the municipalities in the form of local aid.

"The Legislature has not expanded state programs like they did in the 1980's. Most of the increased spending over the past decade has been targeted at education, infrastructure repairs, and local aid. Most other state programs have been level funded for years," explains retired Milton Town Accountant and current retirement board member Joe Graziani, who is also an Association vice president. "There is not a lot to cut at the state level.

"My sense is that the $1.5 billion will be taken from the cities and towns. Here in Milton we are already stretched paper thin, we could not afford to take a hit in local aid without raising taxes or making some severe budget reductions of our own."

Most observers feel that those reductions would come from layoffs and reductions in employee/retiree benefits. Since pension benefits are contractually guaranteed under state law, they cannot be altered, but future COLAs could be reduced. While general health insurance benefits are guaranteed, there are many changes that can take place to reduce the costs incurred by the municipality.

For instance, Chapter 32B (health insurance law) guarantees that the municipality will pay a certain percentage of the premiums as voted. Beyond the contribution rate, municipalities can alter the type of coverage offered, increase copayments and deductibles, and restrict the types of services covered. Nearly identical changes can also be put in place at the state level for members insured through the Group Insurance Commission.

"Members need to pay very close attention to this issue. Even assuming this may have a positive long-term impact on the business community, it will have an immediate negative impact on our members," says Association President Ralph White. "Anyone who thinks they are immune from these potential cuts better go back and reexamine the facts. You cannot take more than a billion dollars off the table and expect there to be no consequences. Without these revenues, a city or town could be hard pressed into making substantial alterations in their health plans, possibly even dropping their indemnity plan."

 
< Prev   Next >