Skip to content

MassRetirees.com

Increase font size  Decrease font size  Default font size 
You are here:   Home arrow Healthcare arrow Strong Push For Coalition Bargaining On Local Health Insurance
Strong Push For Coalition Bargaining On Local Health Insurance PDF Print E-mail
MAY 2005 - Dracut: Latest to Adopt Law - In several communities, a serious push is underway by retirees and employees for the adoption of the local option law (Section 19 of Chapter 32B), which allows for coalition bargaining on their health insurance. Some of these efforts are producing positive results.

“I'm pleased to report that coalition bargaining has been adopted in Dracut with our selectmen voting unanimously for it,” states Andy Powell, a fire captain and chairman of the town's insurance advisory committee. “There are many individuals and groups that helped achieve this landmark, and I'll take this opportunity to thank the Association for its support of our efforts here.”

Recently, Melrose officials joined with union representatives in support of Section 19. Final adoption of coalition bargaining for Melrose is contingent upon enactment of a home rule petition that would allow the city to contribute slightly more to the HMO premiums of their retirees than employees.

Editor's Note: Melrose's home rule petition is unique in that it is not mandated by Section 19. Since the coalition bargaining law requires that the city's contribution to the HMO premium be the same for all enrollees (retirees, employees and survivors), the home rule petition, allowing for different rates, became necessary.

In Tewksbury, its Board of Selectmen voted to adopt Section 19. As we went to press, the town's unions will be voting to complete the process and implement coalition bargaining there.

“There's growing interest in coalition bargaining from local retiree organizations, for example the Quincy Retiree Association,” according to our Insurance Coordinator Cheryl Stillman. “What we're seeing in Dracut, Melrose and Tewksbury is representative of developments throughout the Commonwealth.”

Upon adopting the coalition bargaining law, municipal officials are negotiating on health insurance plans, with one bargaining committee, which includes a retiree, designated by our Association, and representatives from each of the local unions. “It's an innovative approach since retirees are sitting at the same negotiation table with the unions and city officials, hammering out their insurance plans,” continued Stillman.

GASB May Intensify Interest

Interest in coalition bargaining law may further intensify as we draw closer to a deadline, which will have far-reaching impact on state and local insurance plans for retirees and survivors. That deadline is the eventual implementation of the GASB (Government Accounting Standards Board) standards for pre-funding public retiree healthcare costs.

State and local officials generally adhere to the accounting standards, established by GASB, including what information they must include in their financial reports. Currently GASB requires them to report the cost of healthcare benefits for a particular year.

Last year (see September 2004 Voice), GASB finalized standards, entitled OPEB (Other Post Employment Benefits), requiring state and local officials to report the long-term cost of employee/retiree healthcare benefits and how they intend to pay it. While the OPEB standards will be implemented, on a staggered basis, starting July 1, 2007, they are already having an impact, as reported in a related article.

According to John Brouder of Boston Benefit Partners, “In our consulting work with local teacher and employee unions, we've observed a growing recognition by retirees and employees of GASB's potential impact. Our clients have also recognized that coalition bargaining may offer the best safeguards when it (GASB) is eventually implemented.”

 
< Prev   Next >